Is the House Up for Grabs?

By
Stuart Rothenberg, Roll Call (Mar. 19, 2013)
0 Comments

 

Three weeks ago, I discussed whether the House is likely to flip control next year by looking at historical trends and “big picture” questions. Those trends show that the Democrats’ task is a challenging one.

But as the past two cycles have shown, rules are made to be broken. So now, it’s time to get into the weeds to see where the two parties stand at the beginning of a cycle that undoubtedly has many twists and turns ahead of it.

Democrats need to net 17 seats next year to reach a 218-seat majority in the House.

Democratic operatives identify 30 House Republicans who won by less than 10 points last year and assert that the margin makes them vulnerable in 2014. But the GOP incumbents who won by less than 10 points didn’t start, or end, at the same place last cycle.

For example, Republican Rep. Tom Latham of Iowa defeated another incumbent, Democrat Leonard L. Boswell, running in territory very different from the Republican’s district last decade. Because of that, Latham’s 8-point victory — in a district that President Barack Obama won by more than 4 points — is a sign of strength, not vulnerability.

Similarly, Republican Rep. Steve King’s 8-point victory in another Iowa district over a highly touted Democrat isn’t a sign of vulnerability. King beat Christie Vilsack, wife of the former governor and current secretary of Agriculture, by almost the identical margin that Mitt Romney beat Obama in the district, suggesting a polarized electorate with a clear Republican bent.

North Carolina GOP Rep. Richard Hudson knocked off Democratic Rep. Larry Kissell by “only” 7.9 points, but that hardly suggests a great opportunity for Democrats next year in a district that Romney won by about 17 points.

for more, please visit our friends at Roll Call

Comments
Add a comment
Aug
01

1946: Truman signs the Fulbright Scholarship Act...