President's NSA Proposals

(White House document)


 Office of the Press Secretary 

For Immediate Release January 17, 2014 



SUBJECT: Signals Intelligence Activities 


The United States, like other nations, has gathered intelligence 

throughout its history to ensure that national security and 

foreign policy decisionmakers have access to timely, accurate, 

and insightful information. 

The collection of signals intelligence is necessary for the 

United States to advance its national security and foreign 

policy interests and to protect its citizens and the citizens of 

its allies and partners from harm. At the same time, signals 

intelligence activities and the possibility that such activities 

may be improperly disclosed to the public pose multiple risks. 

These include risks to: our relationships with other nations, 

including the cooperation we receive from other nations on law 

enforcement, counterterrorism, and other issues; our commercial, 

economic, and financial interests, including a potential loss of 

international trust in U.S. firms and the decreased willingness 

of other nations to participate in international data sharing, 

privacy, and regulatory regimes; the credibility of our 

commitment to an open, interoperable, and secure global 

Internet; and the protection of intelligence sources and 


In addition, our signals intelligence activities must take into 

account that all persons should be treated with dignity and 

respect, regardless of their nationality or wherever they might 

reside, and that all persons have legitimate privacy interests 

in the handling of their personal information. 

In determining why, whether, when, and how the United States 

conducts signals intelligence activities, we must weigh all of 

these considerations in a context in which information and 

communications technologies are constantly changing. The 

evolution of technology has created a world where communications 

important to our national security and the communications all of 

us make as part of our daily lives are transmitted through the 

same channels. This presents new and diverse opportunities for, 

and challenges with respect to, the collection of intelligence – 

and especially signals intelligence. The United States 

Intelligence Community (IC) has achieved remarkable success in 

developing enhanced capabilities to perform its signals 

intelligence mission in this rapidly changing world, and these 

enhanced capabilities are a major reason we have been able to 

adapt to a dynamic and challenging security environment.1 The 

1 For the purposes of this directive, the terms "Intelligence Community" and 

"elements of the Intelligence Community" shall have the same meaning as they 

do in Executive Order 12333 of December 4, 1981, as amended (Executive Order 


United States must preserve and continue to develop a robust and 

technologically advanced signals intelligence capability to 

protect our security and that of our partners and allies. Our 

signals intelligence capabilities must also be agile enough to 

enable us to focus on fleeting opportunities or emerging crises 

and to address not only the issues of today, but also the issues 

of tomorrow, which we may not be able to foresee. 

Advanced technologies can increase risks, as well as 

opportunities, however, and we must consider these risks when 

deploying our signals intelligence capabilities. The IC 

conducts signals intelligence activities with care and precision 

to ensure that its collection, retention, use, and dissemination 

of signals intelligence account for these risks. In light of 

the evolving technological and geopolitical environment, we must 

continue to ensure that our signals intelligence policies and 

practices appropriately take into account our alliances and 

other partnerships; the leadership role that the United States 

plays in upholding democratic principles and universal human 

rights; the increased globalization of trade, investment, and 

information flows; our commitment to an open, interoperable and 

secure global Internet; and the legitimate privacy and civil 

liberties concerns of U.S. citizens and citizens of other 


Presidents have long directed the acquisition of foreign 

intelligence and counterintelligence2 pursuant to their 

constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and 

to fulfill their constitutional responsibilities as Commander in 

Chief and Chief Executive. They have also provided direction on 

the conduct of intelligence activities in furtherance of these 

authorities and responsibilities, as well as in execution of 

laws enacted by the Congress. Consistent with this historical 

practice, this directive articulates principles to guide why, 

whether, when, and how the United States conducts signals 

intelligence activities for authorized foreign intelligence and 

counterintelligence purposes.3 

Section 1. Principles Governing the Collection of Signals 


Signals intelligence collection shall be authorized and 

conducted consistent with the following principles: 

(a) The collection of signals intelligence shall be 

authorized by statute or Executive Order, proclamation, 

or other Presidential directive, and undertaken in 

2 For the purposes of this directive, the terms "foreign intelligence" and 

"counterintelligence" shall have the same meaning as they have in Executive 

Order 12333. Thus, "foreign intelligence" means "information relating to the 

capabilities, intentions, or activities of foreign governments or elements 

thereof, foreign organizations, foreign persons, or international 

terrorists," and "counterintelligence" means "information gathered and 

activities conducted to identify, deceive, exploit, disrupt, or protect 

against espionage, other intelligence activities, sabotage, or assassinations 

conducted for or on behalf of foreign powers, organizations, or persons, or 

their agents, or international terrorist organizations or activities." 

Executive Order 12333 further notes that "[i]ntelligence includes foreign 

intelligence and counterintelligence." 

3 Unless otherwise specified, this directive shall apply to signals 

intelligence activities conducted in order to collect communications or 

information about communications, except that it shall not apply to signals 

intelligence activities undertaken to test or develop signals intelligence 


(b) Privacy and civil liberties shall be integral 

accordance with the Constitution and applicable statutes, 

Executive Orders, proclamations, and Presidential 



considerations in the planning of U.S. signals 

intelligence activities. The United States shall not 

collect signals intelligence for the purpose of 

suppressing or burdening criticism or dissent, or for 

disadvantaging persons based on their ethnicity, race, 

gender, sexual orientation, or religion. Signals 

intelligence shall be collected exclusively where there 

is a foreign intelligence or counterintelligence purpose 

to support national and departmental missions and not for 

any other purposes. 


(c) The collection of foreign private commercial information 

or trade secrets is authorized only to protect the 

national security of the United States or its partners 

and allies. It is not an authorized foreign intelligence 

or counterintelligence purpose to collect such 

information to afford a competitive advantage4 to U.S. 

companies and U.S. business sectors commercially. 


(d) Signals intelligence activities shall be as tailored as 

feasible. In determining whether to collect signals 

intelligence, the United States shall consider the 

availability of other information, including from 

diplomatic and public sources. Such appropriate and 

feasible alternatives to signals intelligence should be 



Sec. 2. Limitations on the Use of Signals Intelligence 

Collected in Bulk. 

Locating new or emerging threats and other vital national 

security information is difficult, as such information is often 

hidden within the large and complex system of modern global 

communications. The United States must consequently collect 

signals intelligence in bulk5 in certain circumstances in order 

to identify these threats. Routine communications and 

communications of national security interest increasingly 

transit the same networks, however, and the collection of 

signals intelligence in bulk may consequently result in the 

collection of information about persons whose activities are not 

of foreign intelligence or counterintelligence value. The 

United States will therefore impose new limits on its use of 

signals intelligence collected in bulk. These limits are 

intended to protect the privacy and civil liberties of all 

persons, whatever their nationality and regardless of where they 

might reside. 

In particular, when the United States collects nonpublicly 

available signals intelligence in bulk, it shall use that data 

4 Certain economic purposes, such as identifying trade or sanctions violations 

or government influence or direction, shall not constitute competitive 


5 The limitations contained in this section do not apply to signals 

intelligence data that is temporarily acquired to facilitate targeted 

collection. References to signals intelligence collected in "bulk" mean the 

authorized collection of large quantities of signals intelligence data which, 

due to technical or operational considerations, is acquired without the use 

of discriminants (e.g., specific identifiers, selection terms, etc.). 

only for the purposes of detecting and countering: (1) 

espionage and other threats and activities directed by foreign 

powers or their intelligence services against the United States 

and its interests; (2) threats to the United States and its 

interests from terrorism; (3) threats to the United States and 

its interests from the development, possession, proliferation, 

or use of weapons of mass destruction; (4) cybersecurity 

threats; (5) threats to U.S. or allied Armed Forces or other U.S 

or allied personnel; and (6) transnational criminal threats, 

including illicit finance and sanctions evasion related to the 

other purposes named in this section. In no event may signals 

intelligence collected in bulk be used for the purpose of 

suppressing or burdening criticism or dissent; disadvantaging 

persons based on their ethnicity, race, gender, sexual 

orientation, or religion; affording a competitive advantage to 

U.S. companies and U.S. business sectors commercially; or 

achieving any purpose other than those identified in this 


The Assistant to the President and National Security Advisor 

(APNSA), in consultation with the Director of National 

Intelligence (DNI), shall coordinate, on at least an annual 

basis, a review of the permissible uses of signals intelligence 

collected in bulk through the National Security Council 

Principals and Deputies Committee system identified in PPD-1 or 

any successor document. At the end of this review, I will be 

presented with recommended additions to or removals from the 

list of the permissible uses of signals intelligence collected 

in bulk. 

The DNI shall maintain a list of the permissible uses of signals 

intelligence collected in bulk. This list shall be updated as 

necessary and made publicly available to the maximum extent 

feasible, consistent with the national security. 

Sec. 3. Refining the Process for Collecting Signals 


U.S. intelligence collection activities present the potential 

for national security damage if improperly disclosed. Signals 

intelligence collection raises special concerns, given the 

opportunities and risks created by the constantly evolving 

technological and geopolitical environment; the unique nature of 

such collection and the inherent concerns raised when signals 

intelligence can only be collected in bulk; and the risk of 

damage to our national security interests and our law 

enforcement, intelligence-sharing, and diplomatic relationships 

should our capabilities or activities be compromised. It is, 

therefore, essential that national security policymakers 

consider carefully the value of signals intelligence activities 

in light of the risks entailed in conducting these activities. 

To enable this judgment, the heads of departments and agencies 

that participate in the policy processes for establishing 

signals intelligence priorities and requirements shall, on an 

annual basis, review any priorities or requirements identified 

by their departments or agencies and advise the DNI whether each 

should be maintained, with a copy of the advice provided to the 


Additionally, the classified Annex to this directive, which 

supplements the existing policy process for reviewing signals 

intelligence activities, affirms that determinations about 

whether and how to conduct signals intelligence activities must 

carefully evaluate the benefits to our national interests and 

the risks posed by those activities.6 

Sec. 4. Safeguarding Personal Information Collected Through 

Signals Intelligence. 

All persons should be treated with dignity and respect, 

regardless of their nationality or wherever they might reside, 

and all persons have legitimate privacy interests in the 

handling of their personal information.7 U.S. signals 

intelligence activities must, therefore, include appropriate 

safeguards for the personal information of all individuals, 

regardless of the nationality of the individual to whom the 

information pertains or where that individual resides.

(a) Policies and Procedures. The DNI, in consultation with 

the Attorney General, shall ensure that all elements of 

the IC establish policies and procedures that apply the 

following principles for safeguarding personal 

information collected from signals intelligence 

activities. To the maximum extent feasible consistent 

with the national security, these policies and procedures 

are to be applied equally to the personal information of 

all persons, regardless of nationality:


i. Minimization. The sharing of intelligence that 

contains personal information is necessary to protect 

our national security and advance our foreign policy 

interests, as it enables the United States to 

coordinate activities across our government. At the 

same time, however, by setting appropriate limits on 

such sharing, the United States takes legitimate 

privacy concerns into account and decreases the risks 

that personal information will be misused or 

mishandled. Relatedly, the significance to our 

national security of intelligence is not always 

apparent upon an initial review of information: 

intelligence must be retained for a sufficient period 

of time for the IC to understand its relevance and use 

6 Section 3 of this directive, and the directive's classified Annex, do not 

apply to (1) signals intelligence activities undertaken by or for the Federal 

Bureau of Investigation in support of predicated investigations other than 

those conducted solely for purposes of acquiring foreign intelligence; or (2) 

signals intelligence activities undertaken in support of military operations 

in an area of active hostilities, covert action, or human intelligence 


7 Departments and agencies shall apply the term "personal information" in a 

manner that is consistent for U.S. persons and non-U.S. persons. 

Accordingly, for the purposes of this directive, the term "personal 

information" shall cover the same types of information covered by 

"information concerning U.S. persons" under section 2.3 of Executive Order 


8 The collection, retention, and dissemination of information concerning 

"United States persons" is governed by multiple legal and policy 

requirements, such as those required by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance 

Act and Executive Order 12333. For the purposes of this directive, the term 

"United States person" shall have the same meaning as it does in Executive 

Order 12333. 

9 The policies and procedures of affected elements of the IC shall also be 

consistent with any additional IC policies, standards, procedures, and 

guidance the DNI, in coordination with the Attorney General, the heads of IC 

elements, and the heads of any other departments containing such elements, 

may issue to implement these principles. This directive is not intended to 

alter the rules applicable to U.S. persons in Executive Order 12333, the 

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or other applicable law. 

it to meet our national security needs. However, 

long-term storage of personal information unnecessary 

to protect our national security is inefficient, 

unnecessary, and raises legitimate privacy concerns. 

Accordingly, IC elements shall establish policies and 

procedures reasonably designed to minimize the 

dissemination and retention of personal information 

collected from signals intelligence activities. 


 Dissemination: Personal information shall be 

 Retention: Personal information shall be retained 

disseminated only if the dissemination of comparable 

information concerning U.S. persons would be 

permitted under section 2.3 of Executive Order 



only if the retention of comparable information 

concerning U.S. persons would be permitted under 

section 2.3 of Executive Order 12333 and shall be 

subject to the same retention periods as applied to 

comparable information concerning U.S. persons. 

Information for which no such determination has been 

made shall not be retained for more than 5 years, 

unless the DNI expressly determines that continued 

retention is in the national security interests of 

the United States. 


Additionally, within 180 days of the date of this 

directive, the DNI, in coordination with the 

Attorney General, the heads of other elements of the 

IC, and the heads of departments and agencies 

containing other elements of the IC, shall prepare a 

report evaluating possible additional dissemination 

and retention safeguards for personal information 

collected through signals intelligence, consistent 

with technical capabilities and operational needs. 


ii. Data Security and Access. When our national security 

and foreign policy needs require us to retain certain 

intelligence, it is vital that the United States take 

appropriate steps to ensure that any personal 

information contained within that intelligence is 

secure. Accordingly, personal information shall be 

processed and stored under conditions that provide 

adequate protection and prevent access by unauthorized 

persons, consistent with the applicable safeguards for 

sensitive information contained in relevant Executive 

Orders, proclamations, Presidential directives, 

IC directives, and associated policies. Access to 

such personal information shall be limited to 

authorized personnel with a need to know the 

information to perform their mission, consistent with 

the personnel security requirements of relevant 

Executive Orders, IC directives, and associated 

policies. Such personnel will be provided appropriate 

and adequate training in the principles set forth in 

this directive. These persons may access and use the 

information consistent with applicable laws and 

Executive Orders and the principles of this directive; 

personal information for which no determination has 

been made that it can be permissibly disseminated or 

retained under section 4(a)(i) of this directive shall 

be accessed only in order to make such determinations 

(or to conduct authorized administrative, security, 

and oversight functions). 

iii. Data Quality. IC elements strive to provide national 

security policymakers with timely, accurate, and 

insightful intelligence, and inaccurate records and 

reporting can not only undermine our national security 

interests, but also can result in the collection or 

analysis of information relating to persons whose 

activities are not of foreign intelligence or 

counterintelligence value. Accordingly, personal 

information shall be included in intelligence products 

only as consistent with applicable IC standards for 

accuracy and objectivity, as set forth in relevant 

IC directives. Moreover, while IC elements should 

apply the IC Analytic Standards as a whole, particular 

care should be taken to apply standards relating to 

the quality and reliability of the information, 

consideration of alternative sources of information 

and interpretations of data, and objectivity in 

performing analysis. 


iv. Oversight. The IC has long recognized that effective 


oversight is necessary to ensure that we are 

protecting our national security in a manner 

consistent with our interests and values. 

Accordingly, the policies and procedures of IC 

elements, and departments and agencies containing IC 

elements, shall include appropriate measures to 

facilitate oversight over the implementation of 

safeguards protecting personal information, to include 

periodic auditing against the standards required by 

this section. 

The policies and procedures shall also recognize and 

facilitate the performance of oversight by the 

Inspectors General of IC elements, and departments and 

agencies containing IC elements, and other relevant 

oversight entities, as appropriate and consistent with 

their responsibilities. When a significant compliance 

issue occurs involving personal information of any 

person, regardless of nationality, collected as a 

result of signals intelligence activities, the issue 

shall, in addition to any existing reporting 

requirements, be reported promptly to the DNI, who 

shall determine what, if any, corrective actions are 

necessary. If the issue involves a non-United States 

person, the DNI, in consultation with the Secretary of 

State and the head of the notifying department or 

agency, shall determine whether steps should be taken 

to notify the relevant foreign government, consistent 

with the protection of sources and methods and of U.S. 



(b) Update and Publication. Within 1 year of the date of 

this directive, IC elements shall update or issue new 

policies and procedures as necessary to implement 

section 4 of this directive, in coordination with the 

DNI. To enhance public understanding of, and promote 

public trust in, the safeguards in place to protect 

personal information, these updated or newly issued 

policies and procedures shall be publicly released 

to the maximum extent possible, consistent with 

classification requirements. 


(c) Privacy and Civil Liberties Policy Official. To help 

ensure that the legitimate privacy interests all people 

share related to the handling of their personal 

information are appropriately considered in light of the 

principles in this section, the APNSA, the Director of 

the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the 

Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy 

(OSTP) shall identify one or more senior officials who 

will be responsible for working with the DNI, the 

Attorney General, the heads of other elements of the IC, 

and the heads of departments and agencies containing 

other elements of the IC, as appropriate, as they develop 

the policies and procedures called for in this section. 


(d) Coordinator for International Diplomacy. The Secretary 

of State shall identify a senior official within the 

Department of State to coordinate with the responsible 

departments and agencies the United States Government's 

diplomatic and foreign policy efforts related to 

international information technology issues and to serve 

as a point of contact for foreign governments who wish to 

raise concerns regarding signals intelligence activities 

conducted by the United States. 


Sec. 5. Reports. 


(a) Within 180 days of the date of this directive, the DNI 

(b) The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board is 

shall provide a status report that updates me on the 

progress of the IC's implementation of section 4 of this 



encouraged to provide me with a report that assesses the 

implementation of any matters contained within this 

directive that fall within its mandate. 


(c) Within 120 days of the date of this directive, the 

President's Intelligence Advisory Board shall provide 

me with a report identifying options for assessing 

the distinction between metadata and other types of 

information, and for replacing the "need-to-share" or 

"need-to-know" models for classified information sharing 

with a Work-Related Access model. 


(d) Within 1 year of the date of this directive, the DNI, in 

coordination with the heads of relevant elements of the 

IC and OSTP, shall provide me with a report assessing the 

feasibility of creating software that would allow the IC 

more easily to conduct targeted information acquisition 

rather than bulk collection. 


Sec. 6. General Provisions. 


(a) Nothing in this directive shall be construed to prevent 

me from exercising my constitutional authority, including 

as Commander in Chief, Chief Executive, and in the 

conduct of foreign affairs, as well as my statutory 

authority. Consistent with this principle, a recipient 

of this directive may at any time recommend to me, 

through the APNSA, a change to the policies and 

procedures contained in this directive. 


(b) Nothing in this directive shall be construed to 

impair or otherwise affect the authority or 

responsibility granted by law to a United States 

Government department or agency, or the head thereof, 

or the functions of the Director of OMB relating to 

budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals. 

This directive is intended to supplement existing 

processes or procedures for reviewing foreign 

intelligence or counterintelligence activities and should 

not be read to supersede such processes and procedures 

unless explicitly stated. 


(c) This directive shall be implemented consistent with 

applicable U.S. law and subject to the availability of 



(d) This directive is not intended to, and does not, create 

any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, 

enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the 

United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, 

its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

Add a comment

1935: FDR signs the Neutrality Act...